Psychiatry Research
Volume 121, Issue 2 , Pages 169-177, 1 December 2003

Coping behavior in depressed patients: a longitudinal study

  • Kumiko Yamada

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neuropsychiatry, Oita Medical University, Idaigaoka 1-1, Hasamamatchi, Oita gun, Oita 879-5503, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +81-97-586-5823; fax: +81-975-49-3583
  • ,
  • Haruo Nagayama

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neuropsychiatry, Oita Medical University, Idaigaoka 1-1, Hasamamatchi, Oita gun, Oita 879-5503, Japan
  • ,
  • Kounosuke Tsutiyama

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neuropsychiatry, Oita Medical University, Idaigaoka 1-1, Hasamamatchi, Oita gun, Oita 879-5503, Japan
  • ,
  • Tosinori Kitamura

      Affiliations

    • National Center for Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan
  • ,
  • Toshiaki Furukawa

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, Nagoya City University Medical School, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan

Received 28 October 2002; received in revised form 13 August 2003; accepted 20 August 2003.

Abstract 

The relationship of coping behavior to outcome in depressed patients was examined. Subjects (n=105) with major depressive disorder (n=85), depressive disorder not otherwise specified (n=7) or major depressive disorder with axis I comorbidity (n=13) were followed for 6 months. Their coping behavior (i.e. rumination, active distraction, cognitive distraction and dangerous activities) was defined using the Comprehensive Assessment List for Affective Disorders. Based on their Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) scores at 6 months, the patients were categorized as having had a good or a poor outcome. Severity of depression and coping behavior were similar among the three diagnostic groups. At baseline assessment, coping behavior was not correlated with either HRSD score or age. However, males were significantly more likely to be engaged in dangerous activity as a coping behavior than females. Patients with a good outcome at 6 months were significantly more likely to use rumination as a coping behavior while patients with a poor outcome were significantly more likely to use dangerous activity. Multiple regression analysis confirmed this finding, indicating that rumination and dangerous activity were significant predictors of outcome at 6 months. Rumination might be associated with good outcomes in depressed patients while dangerous activity might be associated with poor outcomes.

Keywords: Depression, Coping behavior, Rumination, Dangerous activity, Predictor of outcome

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0165-1781(03)00249-X

doi:10.1016/S0165-1781(03)00249-X

Psychiatry Research
Volume 121, Issue 2 , Pages 169-177, 1 December 2003