Psychiatry Research
Volume 143, Issue 2 , Pages 147-158, 30 August 2006

Prepulse inhibition and P50 suppression: Commonalities and dissociations

  • Bob Oranje

      Affiliations

    • Center for Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, Department of Psychiatry, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +45 3531 2391.
  • ,
  • Mark A. Geyer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA, United States
  • ,
  • Koen B.E. Bocker

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rudolf Magnus Institute for Neurosciences, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • J. Leon Kenemans

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rudolf Magnus Institute for Neurosciences, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Marinus N. Verbaten

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rudolf Magnus Institute for Neurosciences, Utrecht University, The Netherlands

Received 15 October 2004; received in revised form 27 September 2005; accepted 8 November 2005.

Abstract 

Patients with schizophrenia exhibit reduced levels of both prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex (PPI) and condition-test suppression of the P50 event-related potential. This study investigated the extent to which PPI and P50 suppression, which exhibit similar parametric sensitivities, are intrinsically auditory phenomena or can be induced cross-modally, and reflect common or distinct neural mechanisms of inhibition. PPI, N100, and P50 were assessed in 20 healthy male volunteers, using auditory test probes and both visual and auditory lead stimuli, separated by 100- or 500-ms interstimulus intervals (ISIs). PPI was found in the auditory-lead condition across the complete group, and with visual-lead stimuli in approximately half of the subjects. Intra-modal auditory PPI was significantly higher with the 100-ms ISI than with the 500-ms ISI. P50 suppression was found only with the 500-ms ISI, with no difference between the auditory and visual conditions. Source analyses revealed that suppression was associated with frontal cortical activity. N100 suppression was found only in the auditory condition, with no difference between 100- and 500-ms ISIs. Although both phenomena are considered to provide operational measures of gating, PPI and P50 suppression are differentially sensitive to ISI and therefore reflect partly different neural mechanisms. They are not intrinsically auditory phenomena, and both appear to involve frontal cortical activity. In contrast, N100 suppression is most likely based on refractory mechanisms intrinsic to the auditory system.

Keywords: PPI, P50 suppression, Cross-modal, Source localization, Sensory gating, N100

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0165-1781(05)00366-5

doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2005.11.002

Psychiatry Research
Volume 143, Issue 2 , Pages 147-158, 30 August 2006