| | Catechol-O-methyltransferase gene and obsessive–compulsive symptoms in patients with recent-onset schizophrenia: Preliminary results☆Received 28 April 2006; received in revised form 26 January 2007; accepted 1 February 2007. Abstract The catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene is a candidate gene for schizophrenia because of its role in the breakdown of dopamine in the prefrontal cortex. The COMT gene contains a functional polymorphism changing enzyme activity that has been associated with some neuropsychiatric (endo)phenotypes, e.g. cognitive performance and anxiety. In this study we investigated the association between the COMT Val158Met polymorphism and obsessive–compulsive symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. Severity of obsessive–compulsive symptoms in 77 male patients with recent-onset schizophrenia was assessed using the Yale-Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), and the COMT Val158Met polymorphism was genotyped for these patients. We found a significant effect of the COMT genotype on Y-BOCS scores: the Val/Val genotype was associated with the highest Y-BOCS scores, whereas patients with the Met/Met genotype had the lowest Y-BOCS scores. Our data suggest that the COMT high-activity Val allele is associated with more obsessive–compulsive symptoms in young patients with schizophrenia. These results support the hypothesis that the COMT Val158Met polymorphism may be a modifier gene for the symptomatology of schizophrenia. 1. Introduction  The enzyme catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) is involved in the degradation of catecholamines, including dopamine. The COMT gene contains a functional polymorphism (Val158Met) changing enzyme activity: the relatively unstable Met/Met variant leads to a 40% decrease in enzyme activity in comparison to the Val/Val variant. The COMT gene is located on the chromosomal region at 22q11, which is deleted in people with velo-cardio-facial syndrome (VCFS), a syndrome associated with a high prevalence of neuropsychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia-like psychosis and obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) (Murphy et al., 1999, Gothelf et al., 2004). For this reason, and because dopamine is hypothesized to be involved in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia, the association between the COMT Val158Met polymorphism and the prevalence of schizophrenia has been investigated extensively. Although results from a recent meta-analysis show that the Val158Met polymorphism does not increase the risk for schizophrenia (Munafo et al., 2005), there is evidence that the COMT Val158Met polymorphism modifies the schizophrenia phenotype by influencing performance of tasks relying on prefrontal cortex integrity (Egan et al., 2001). Thus, COMT is probably not a susceptibility gene but merely a modifier gene for schizophrenia, meaning COMT may influence clinical features and symptom dimensions associated with schizophrenia without altering disease liability itself (Fanous and Kendler, 2005, Tunbridge et al., 2006). A well-established, frequently occurring and disabling symptom complex in schizophrenia is the co-occurrence of obsessive–compulsive symptoms (OCS) (Poyurovsky et al., 1999, Nechmad et al., 2003, Ongur and Goff, 2005, Byerly et al., 2005). In this study we investigated the role of COMT as a modifier gene in schizophrenia: we explored whether there is a relation between the COMT Val158Met genotype and OCS in a group of patients with recent-onset schizophrenia. 2. Methods  2.1. Subjects All patients were admitted to the Adolescent Clinic of the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam. After a complete description of the study to the subjects, written informed consent was obtained. The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam. Patients who met DSM-IV (American Psychiatric Association, 1994) criteria for schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or schizophreniform disorder were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were organic brain syndrome, endocrine disorder, and substance-induced psychosis. Diagnosis at discharge was established according to DSM-IV criteria and was based on a semi-structured clinical interview by two independent psychiatrists as described previously (de Haan et al., 2002); diagnoses were based on all available clinical information including the semi-structured interview, examination of case records and information from relatives and mental health professionals. On admission, symptoms were rated with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) (Kay et al., 1987); the extent of OCS was assessed with the Yale-Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) (Goodman et al., 1989a, Goodman et al., 1989b). The Y-BOCS consists of 10 topics with scores ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (severe symptoms). Obsessions were defined as persistent, intrusive, unwanted, and repetitive thoughts not related to the patient's delusions. Compulsions were defined as repetitive goal-directed rituals clinically distinguishable from schizophrenic mannerisms or posturing. 2.2. DNA extraction and genetic analysis Blood samples were collected from all subjects for DNA isolation. Genomic deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was extracted using a filter-based method (QIAamp DNA Mini Kit, Qiagen Ltd, United Kingdom). Genotyping of the COMT Val158Met polymorphism (rs4680) was performed by primer extension and analyzed using matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) as previously described (Sauer and Gut, 2002). All DNA samples were genotyped in duplicate to ensure reliability. In brief, a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to amplify the fragments of DNA containing the Val158Met polymorphism using the following primers: forward 5′-CAC CTG TGC TCA CCT CTC CT-3′ and reverse 5′-GGG TTT TCA GTG AAC GTG GT-3′. For the PCR the following reagents were used: 1× PCR buffer, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 5 ng forward primer, 5 ng reverse primer, 0.5 U HotFirePol DNA polymerase (Solis Biodyne, Estonia), 20 ng genomic DNA template, dH2O to a final reaction volume of 10 μl. PCR was carried out on a Biometra Thermocycler machine, using the following conditions: initial 15-min denaturing step at 95°, followed by 35 cycles of 95° for 1 min, 58° for 1 min, 72° for 1.5 min, and a final extension phase of 72° for 10 min. Five microliters of PCR product were treated with 0.2 U shrimp alkaline phosphatase (USB) on 37° for 45 min to dephosphorylate remaining dNTPs. Next, single base primer extension (PEX) using ddNPTs was performed to generate short, single-stranded allele-specific products. We used a biotinylated UV-cleavable PEX primer with the following sequence: 5′-GATGGTGGAT-L-TCGCTGGC-3′; the UV-cleavable site is indicated by L (BioTeZ, Berlin, Germany). For PEX the following reagents were used: 5 mM MgCl2, 0.4 μM PEX primer, 0.2 mM ddATP, 0.2 mM ddGTP, 2.5 U ThermiPol (Thermipol, Solis Biodyne, Estonia), dH2O to a final reaction volume of 10 μl. Primer extension was carried out on a Biometra Thermocycler machine, using the following conditions: initial 5-min denaturing step at 95°, followed by 70 cycles of 95° for 15 s, 40° for 30 s, 72° for 30 s. Dependent on the genotype, the primer was elongated with either a ddATP or a ddGTP. The primer extension product was purified using a 384-well streptavidin coated plate (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. After exposure to UV light (366 nm, 8 W) for 10 min, the 3′ end was released and dissolved into 10 μl dH2O and subsequently spotted onto a MALDI plate (Bruker Daltonics, Germany). Time-of-flight MS was performed on a Bruker III Daltonics Mass Spectrometer using FlexControl v2.0 software. As the varying incorporated nucleotides differ in their mass, the allele-specific products can be determined in the mass spectrum. Data were analyzed using Genotools v2.0 software (Bruker Daltonics, Germany). 2.3. Statistics Analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 12.0. The population was divided into three groups according to COMT genotype. We tested between-group differences in age, educational level and PANSS scores using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Correlations between Y-BOCS scores and PANSS scores were calculated using Pearson's Rho. Between-group differences in the use of medication were assessed using Fisher's exact test. Because data were not normally distributed, we used non-parametric testing (2-tailed) to determine between-group differences in Y-BOCS scores (Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U). Several reports have been published of induction of OCS in patients with schizophrenia by olanzapine and clozapine (Morrison et al., 1998, de Haan et al., 1999, Mottard and de la Sablonniere, 1999). Therefore, we looked at the use of these antipsychotics in the three genotype groups using Fisher's exact test to test whether medication use could be a confounding factor. In addition, we analyzed differences in mean Y-BOCS scores between COMT genotype groups controlling for the use of antipsychotic medication with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), entering medication as fixed factor in the model. Level of statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. 3. Results  Our initial sample consisted of 86 patients with recent-onset schizophrenia. However, since gender-specific effects have been reported for COMT (Karayiorgou et al., 1997, Karayiorgou et al., 1999, Alsobrook et al., 2002), we decided to use only male patients in our final analyses. In total, 77 male patients with recent-onset schizophrenia were analyzed (paranoid, disorganized or undifferentiated type; n = 69 [89.5%]; schizo-affective disorder n = 8 [10.5%]; mean age = 22.17, S.D. = 2.91, age range 18–30). Mean total PANSS score was 71.3 (S.D. = 21.4), the PANSS Positive subscale score was 17.5 (S.D. = 7.4), the PANSS Negative subscale score was 19.0 (S.D. = 7.1), and the PANSS general psychopathology subscale score was 34.7 (S.D. = 10.5). Y-BOCS scores ranged from 0 to 24 (mean = 3.78, S.D. = 6.42). In the patients with a Y-BOCS score > 0 (24/77, 31%), the mean Y-BOCS score was 12.13 (S.D. = 5.54) and the median was 12.0. No correlation between Y-BOCS scores and PANSS Positive, Negative or General Psychopathology Subscale scores and total PANSS scores was observed (data not shown). At time of testing, most patients were using antipsychotic medication (olanzapine, N = 26; risperidone, N = 22; quetiapine, N = 2; clozapine, N = 13; haloperidol, N = 3; no medication, N = 11). Genotype counts did not deviate from those expected according to the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (χ2 = 2.14, df = 2, P = 0.3). The population was divided in three groups according to COMT genotype. Neither age (F = 0.61, df = 2;74, P = 0.5) nor educational level (F = 0.87, df = 2;74, P = 0.4) differed significantly between genotype groups (Table 1). No differences in total PANSS scores (F = 0.93, df = 2;53, P = 0.4) or in PANSS subscale scores were found between genotype groups (PANSS Positive subscale score: F = 0.33, df = 2;73, P =0.7; PANSS Negative subscale score: F = 0.89, df = 2;73, P = 0.4; PANSS general psychopathology subscale score: F = 0.25, df = 2;73, P = 0.8). Patient characteristics in the three genotype groups are listed in Table 1. | | |  | | Val/Val | Val/Met | Met/Met | |  |
|---|
 | | N = 22 | N = 44 | N = 11 | Test statistic | P-value |  |
|---|
 | Mean age | 21.86 | 21.77 | 22.91 | F = 0.61 | P = 0.5 |  |  | (± SD) | (± 2.95) | (± 3.05) | (± 3.56) |  |  | |  |  | Educational level |  |  | Mean | 4.41 | 4.14 | 3.91 | F = 0.87 | P = 0.4 |  |  | (SD; min–max) | (1.05; 2–6) | (1.13; 2–6) | (0.94; 2–5) |  |  | |  |  | Antipsychotics: |  |  | – No medication | 2 | 6 | 3 | Fisher's exact = 8.97 | P = 0.5 |  |  | – Olanzapine | 8 | 16 | 2 |  |  | – Risperidone | 7 | 12 | 3 |  |  | – Clozapine | 5 | 7 | 1 |  |  | – Quetiapine | 0 | 2 | 0 |  |  | – Typical antipsychotics | 0 | 1 | 2 |  |  | SSRIs y/n | 3/19 | 2/42 | 1/10 | Fisher's exact = 2.05 | P = 0.4 |  |  | Mean Y-BOCS score | 7.32 | 2.95 | 0.00 | Kruskal–Wallis χ2 = 8.79 | P = 0.012 |  |  | (SD) | (8.80) | (4.93) | (0.00) |  |  | (minimum–maximum) | (0–24) | (0–16) | (0–0) |  |  | Y-BOCS score ≥ 12 | 9 | 4 | 0 | χ2 = 11.14 | P = 0.002 |  |  | Y-BOCS score ≥ 16 | 4 | 1 | 0 | Fisher's exact = 5.23 | P = 0.045 |  | | | |
There was a significant between-group difference in mean Y-BOCS scores (Kruskal–Wallis: χ2 = 8.79, df = 2, P = 0.012). Further exploration with Mann–Whitney U testing revealed that mean Y-BOCS scores in the Val/Val group (n = 22, mean Y-BOCS score = 7.32, S.D. = 8.80) were significantly higher than those in the Met/Met group (n = 11, mean Y-BOCS score = 0.00, S.D. = 0.00) (Z = − 2.58, P = 0.010). Also, Y-BOCS scores in the Val/Met group (n = 44, mean Y-BOCS score = 2.95, S.D. = 4.93) were significantly higher than those with Met/Met genotype (Z = − 2.12, P = 0.034). There was a trend for a difference in Y-BOCS scores between the Val/Val and the Val/Met group (Z = − 1.85, P = 0.065) (Fig. 1). In addition, mean Y-BOCS scores in Val carriers (Val/Val and Val/Met individuals, N = 66) were significantly higher than in Met homozygotes (N = 11) (Z = − 2.34, P = 0.019). We did not observe differences in the use of clozapine and olanzapine between genotype groups (Fisher's exact = 2.99, P = 0.2). Also, mean Y-BOCS scores in patients using olanzapine or clozapine (n = 39, mean Y-BOCS score = 3.74, S.D. = 5.61) were not significantly different from scores in those using other antipsychotic agents (n = 27, mean Y-BOCS score = 3.59, S.D. = 6.99, Mann–Whitney U test: Z = − 0.58, P = 0.6). The effect of COMT genotype on Y-BOCS scores remained significant when we analyzed our data correcting for medication as a possible confounding factor (F = 9.15, df = 2;62, P < 0.001). We found no evidence for an effect of antipsychotic medication on Y-BOCS scores (F = 0.80, df = 5;62, P = 0.6) or for a COMT × medication interaction (F = 1.37, df = 7;62, P = 0.2). Six of the 77 patients (8%) used selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in addition to their antipsychotic medication: three in the Val/Val group, two in the Val/Met group and one in the Met/Met group (Table 1). Using Chi-square tests, no significant difference in the use of SSRIs between the three genotype groups was found (Fisher's exact = 2.05, P = 0.4). 4. Discussion  In our sample of male patients with recent-onset schizophrenia we found the COMT high-activity Val allele to be associated with more severe OCS. To our best knowledge, this is the first report of an association between the COMT Val158Met genotype and OCS in a population of patients with schizophrenia. 4.1. COMT and risk for OCD without schizophrenia It is still unclear whether the Val158Met polymorphism increases the risk of OCD: although three studies reported that the Met allele increased the risk of OCD (Karayiorgou et al., 1997, Karayiorgou et al., 1999, Alsobrook et al., 2002), five studies either failed to replicate this (Azzam and Mathews, 2003, Erdal et al., 2003, Meira-Lima et al., 2004) or found an association with either homozygosity (Schindler et al., 2000) or heterozygosity (Niehaus et al., 2001) at this locus. Therefore, similar to results from studies investigating the association between COMT and schizophrenia (Munafo et al., 2005), the association between the COMT Val158Met polymorphism and OCD is still inconclusive. However, three out of eight studies reported an association between OCD and the low-activity Met allele, whereas we found an association between the high-activity Val allele and more OCS in schizophrenia. It is important to emphasize that we have investigated effects of the COMT genotype on OCS in patients with schizophrenia, therefore making it difficult to compare our results with those from studies investigating the association between the COMT genotype and OCD without schizophrenia. Also, most studies looking at COMT and OCD investigated the risk of OCD in the presence of a specific COMT genotype, whereas we took a dimensional approach using Y-BOCS scores as a quantitative phenotype. One study that used a similar approach reported an association between the COMT high-activity Val allele and phobic anxiety in a large sample of over 1200 subjects (McGrath et al., 2004). In this respect, the Val allele could be considered a risk allele for anxiety symptoms. 4.2. Limitations and advances of the study This study has several limitations. Sample size is relatively small; therefore, results should be considered preliminary. However, two recent studies (Wahlstrom et al., 2007, McIntosh et al., 2007) reported on the effect of the COMT Val158Met polymorphism in samples of similar size (70 and 77 subjects, respectively). Thus, our sample size is small but not uncommon. A second limitation of our study is genetic heterogeneity. Since the effect of the COMT Val158Met genotype on the extent of OCS remained significant when we analyzed our data including male patients of Dutch ancestry only (N = 54; Kruskal–Wallis: χ2 = 6.60, df = 2, P = 0.037), we think it is unlikely our results are false-positive. Also, since the COMT Val158Met polymorphism is functional, i.e. leads to an amino acid substitution known to affect the thermostability of the COMT protein (Chen et al., 2004), it is likely that effects on enzymatic activity are similar across ethnic populations. Moreover, Chen et al. (2004) established effects of the COMT Val158Met polymorphism on COMT protein stability using postmortem brain tissue from an ethnically mixed sample including white Caucasian and African American subjects: 66% of healthy controls and 52% of schizophrenia patients were African Americans. To our best knowledge, there is no evidence that ethnicity modulates functional effects of the COMT Val158Met polymorphism on COMT activity. However, the precise relationship between ethnicity and these functional effects has not yet been investigated; future research is needed to examine this. Previous studies reported that the Val allele is more frequent in non-Caucasian samples (Palmatier et al., 1999). Thus, ethnicity could confound our data if non-Caucasian subjects (who are likely to carry more Val alleles) had more OCS than Caucasian subjects. However, in our sample Y-BOCS scores did not differ between ethnic groups. Therefore, we consider ethnicity an unlikely confounder in our study. Nevertheless, since this is the first report of an association between the COMT Val158Met polymorphism and OCS in patients with schizophrenia, our findings need to be replicated in a large and genetically homogeneous sample. Several reports have described the induction of OCS by clozapine and olanzapine (de Haan et al., 1999, Mottard and de la Sablonniere, 1999, Ongur and Goff, 2005). However, since no randomized controlled trials examining this have been performed yet, it is controversial whether these agents really induce OCS. In our study no difference in the use of olanzapine and clozapine between genotype groups was observed; therefore we do not think this to be a confounding factor. Furthermore, when we analyzed our data correcting for antipsychotic medication as a possible confounding factor, the effect of the COMT genotype on Y-BOCS scores seemed increased in comparison to the ‘uncorrected’ analysis (P < 0.001 and P = 0.012, respectively). In a recent report, clozapine was reported to induce OCS in some patients with schizophrenia, whereas it was associated with a decrease in existing OCS in others (de Haan et al., 2004); it is possible that these differences can be explained by genetic variation. Our analyses included only male patients with schizophrenia; future studies should investigate whether COMT genotype has similar effects on OCS in female patients with schizophrenia. Differentiating between males and females is important, since previous studies reported gender-specific effects of the COMT genotype on the risk for OCD (Karayiorgou et al., 1997, Karayiorgou et al., 1999, Alsobrook et al., 2002). Furthermore, gender-specific effects of COMT have been reported in COMT-deficient mice (Gogos et al., 1998) and may result from the down-regulation of COMT expression by estrogens (Jiang et al., 2003). 4.3. Neurobiological mechanism Prefrontal dysfunction and impaired dopaminergic neurotransmission resulting in abnormal prefrontal regulation of striatal activity are mechanisms hypothesized to play a role in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia (Weinberger et al., 2001). Disturbances in dopaminergic systems in schizophrenia may not only lead to psychotic symptoms, but also to OCS since evidence for increased dopaminergic neurotransmission in the striatum in patients with OCD has been found (van der Wee et al., 2004, Denys et al., 2004). Disruption of frontostriatal circuits have been observed in both patients with schizophrenia and OCD. Structural MRI studies have identified specific parts of the frontostriatal system that are altered in OCD (Pujol et al., 2004). Furthermore, patients with OCD show decreased fronto-striatal responsiveness during planning and executive tasks (van den Heuvel et al., 2005), which is a finding similar to those in patients with schizophrenia (Morey et al., 2005). It is possible that by indirect downstream effects on dopamine regulation of striatum and basal ganglia, the COMT gene may modulate the risk for OCS and OCD in schizophrenia. Apart from dopamine, COMT is also important for the degradation of noradrenalin: e.g. COMT-deficient mice show changes in the levels of dopamine and its metabolites, but also in noradrenalin levels (Gogos et al., 1998, Huotari et al., 2002). The noradrenergic system is involved in behavioral responses to stress, i.e. anxiety (Morilak et al., 2005), and a relative increase of noradrenalin levels by selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) reduces anxiety in depressed patients (Blier and Szabo, 2005). Similarly, people with the COMT Met/Met genotype (with relatively increased noradrenalin levels) may be less vulnerable to the development of anxiety disorders (Eley et al., 2003, Rothe et al., 2006). Thus, the mechanism by which COMT influences the severity of OCS in patients with schizophrenia may be via modulation of dopaminergic or noradrenergic systems; further research is needed to clarify which of these pathways is the most important one. 4.4. COMT: a possible pharmacogenetic target? Recently, pharmacological inhibitors of COMT, e.g. entacapone and tolcapone, have received increased attention in the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease (Keating and Lyseng-Williamson, 2005). COMT inhibitors stabilize dopamine levels by reducing the breakdown of dopamine (Muller et al., 2006) and have been reported to ameliorate cognitive symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease (Gasparini et al., 1997). Tolcapone, a COMT inhibitor acting both in the peripheral and in the central nervous system (Keating and Lyseng-Williamson, 2005), may have important therapeutic implications for patients with schizophrenia. However, further research is warranted to investigate the safety and efficacy of the use of COMT inhibitors in patients with schizophrenia. In conclusion, our preliminary data suggest that the COMT high-activity Val allele is associated with more obsessive–compulsive symptoms in young males with schizophrenia. Therefore, our results further support the hypothesis that the COMT Val158Met polymorphism may be a modifier gene for the symptomatology of schizophrenia. References  Alsobrook et al., 2002. 1.Alsobrook JP, Zohar AH, Leboyer M, Chabane N, Ebstein RP, Pauls DL. Association between the COMT locus and obsessive–compulsive disorder in females but not males. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 2002;1:116–120. American Psychiatric Association, 1994. 2.American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1994;. Azzam and Mathews, 2003. 3.Azzam A, Mathews CA. Meta-analysis of the association between the catecholamine-O-methyl-transferase gene and obsessive–compulsive disorder. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 2003;1:64–69. Blier and Szabo, 2005. 4.Blier P, Szabo ST. Potential mechanisms of action of atypical antipsychotic medications in treatment-resistant depression and anxiety. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2005;66(Suppl 8):30–40. Byerly et al., 2005. 5.Byerly M, Goodman W, Acholonu W, Bugno R, Rush AJ. Obsessive compulsive symptoms in schizophrenia: frequency and clinical features. Schizophrenia Research. 2005;2–3:309–316. Chen et al., 2004. 6.Chen J, Lipska BK, Halim N, Ma QD, Matsumoto M, Melhem S, et al. Functional analysis of genetic variation in catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT): effects on mRNA, protein, and enzyme activity in postmortem human brain. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2004;5:807–821. de Haan et al., 1999. 7.de Haan L, Linszen DH, Gorsira R. Clozapine and obsessions in patients with recent-onset schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 1999;6:364–365. de Haan et al., 2002. 8.de Haan L, Beuk N, Hoogenboom B, Dingemans P, Linszen D. Obsessive–compulsive symptoms during treatment with olanzapine and risperidone: a prospective study of 113 patients with recent-onset schizophrenia or related disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2002;2:104–107. de Haan et al., 2004. 9.de Haan L, Oekeneva A, Van Amelsvoort T, Linszen D. Obsessive–compulsive disorder and treatment with clozapine in 200 patients with recent-onset schizophrenia or related disorders. European Psychiatry. 2004;8:524. Denys et al., 2004. 10.Denys D, van der WN, Janssen J, de Geus F, Westenberg HG. Low level of dopaminergic D2 receptor binding in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Biological Psychiatry. 2004;10:1041–1045. Egan et al., 2001. 11.Egan MF, Goldberg TE, Kolachana BS, Callicott JH, Mazzanti CM, Straub RE, et al. Effect of COMT Val108/158 Met genotype on frontal lobe function and risk for schizophrenia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2001;12:6917–6922. Eley et al., 2003. 12.Eley TC, Tahir E, Angleitner A, Harriss K, McClay J, Plomin R, et al. Association analysis of MAOA and COMT with neuroticism assessed by peers. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 2003;1:90–96. Erdal et al., 2003. 13.Erdal ME, Tot S, Yazici K, Yazici A, Herken H, Erdem P, et al. Lack of association of catechol-O-methyltransferase gene polymorphism in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Depression and Anxiety. 2003;1:41–45. Fanous and Kendler, 2005. 14.Fanous AH, Kendler KS. Genetic heterogeneity, modifier genes, and quantitative phenotypes in psychiatric illness: searching for a framework. Molecular Psychiatry. 2005;1:6–13. Gasparini et al., 1997. 15.Gasparini M, Fabrizio E, Bonifati V, Meco G. Cognitive improvement during Tolcapone treatment in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Neural Transmission. 1997;8–9:887–894. Gogos et al., 1998. 16.Gogos JA, Morgan M, Luine V, Santha M, Ogawa S, Pfaff D, et al. Catechol-O-methyltransferase-deficient mice exhibit sexually dimorphic changes in catecholamine levels and behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1998;17:9991–9996. Goodman et al., 1989a. 17.Goodman WK, Price LH, Rasmussen SA, Mazure C, Delgado P, Heninger GR, et al. The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. II. Validity. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1989;11:1012–1016. Goodman et al., 1989b. 18.Goodman WK, Price LH, Rasmussen SA, Mazure C, Fleischmann RL, Hill CL, et al. The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. I. Development, use, and reliability. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1989;11:1006–1011. Gothelf et al., 2004. 19.Gothelf D, Presburger G, Zohar AH, Burg M, Nahmani A, Frydman M, et al. Obsessive–compulsive disorder in patients with velocardiofacial (22q11 deletion) syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 2004;1:99–105. MEDLINE Huotari et al., 2002. 20.Huotari M, Gogos JA, Karayiorgou M, Koponen O, Forsberg M, Raasmaja A, et al. Brain catecholamine metabolism in catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT)-deficient mice. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2002;2:246–256. Jiang et al., 2003. 21.Jiang H, Xie T, Ramsden DB, Ho SL. Human catechol-O-methyltransferase down-regulation by estradiol. Neuropharmacology. 2003;7:1011–1018. Karayiorgou et al., 1997. 22.Karayiorgou M, Altemus M, Galke BL, Goldman D, Murphy DL, Ott J, et al. Genotype determining low catechol-O-methyltransferase activity as a risk factor for obsessive–compulsive disorder. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1997;9:4572–4575. Karayiorgou et al., 1999. 23.Karayiorgou M, Sobin C, Blundell ML, Galke BL, Malinova L, Goldberg P, et al. Family-based association studies support a sexually dimorphic effect of COMT and MAOA on genetic susceptibility to obsessive–compulsive disorder. Biological Psychiatry. 1999;9:1178–1189. Kay et al., 1987. 24.Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 1987;2:261–276. Keating and Lyseng-Williamson, 2005. 25.Keating GM, Lyseng-Williamson KA. Tolcapone: a review of its use in the management of Parkinson's disease. Central Nervous System Drugs. 2005;2:165–184. McGrath et al., 2004. 26.McGrath M, Kawachi I, Ascherio A, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, De VI. Association between catechol-O-methyltransferase and phobic anxiety. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2004;9:1703–1705. McIntosh et al., 2007. 27.McIntosh AM, Baig BJ, Hall J, Job D, Whalley HC, Lymer GK, et al. Relationship of catechol-O-methyltransferase variants to brain structure and function in a population at high risk of psychosis. Biological Psychiatry. 2007;61:1127–1134. Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (3656 KB)
Meira-Lima et al., 2004. 28.Meira-Lima I, Shavitt RG, Miguita K, Ikenaga E, Miguel EC, Vallada H. Association analysis of the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT), serotonin transporter (5-HTT) and serotonin 2A receptor (5HT2A) gene polymorphisms with obsessive–compulsive disorder. Genes, Brain and Behavior. 2004;2:75–79. Morey et al., 2005. 29.Morey RA, Inan S, Mitchell TV, Perkins DO, Lieberman JA, Belger A. Imaging frontostriatal function in ultra-high-risk, early, and chronic schizophrenia during executive processing. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2005;3:254–262. Morilak et al., 2005. 30.Morilak DA, Barrera G, Echevarria DJ, Garcia AS, Hernandez A, Ma S, et al. Role of brain norepinephrine in the behavioral response to stress. Progress in Neuropsychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry. 2005;8:1214–1224. Morrison et al., 1998. 31.Morrison D, Clark D, Goldfarb E, McCoy L. Worsening of obsessive–compulsive symptoms following treatment with olanzapine. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1998;6:855. Mottard and de la Sablonniere, 1999. 32.Mottard JP, de la Sablonniere JF. Olanzapine-induced obsessive–compulsive disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1999;5:799–800. Muller et al., 2006. 33.Muller T, Erdmann C, Muhlack S, Bremen D, Przuntek H, Woitalla D. Inhibition of catechol-O-methyltransferase contributes to more stable levodopa plasma levels. Movement Disorders. 2006;3:332–336. Munafo et al., 2005. 34.Munafo MR, Bowes L, Clark TG, Flint J. Lack of association of the COMT (Val158/108 Met) gene and schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. Molecular Psychiatry. 2005;8:765–770. Murphy et al., 1999. 35.Murphy KC, Jones LA, Owen MJ. High rates of schizophrenia in adults with velo-cardio-facial syndrome. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1999;10:940–945. Nechmad et al., 2003. 36.Nechmad A, Ratzoni G, Poyurovsky M, Meged S, Avidan G, Fuchs C, et al. Obsessive–compulsive disorder in adolescent schizophrenia patients. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2003;5:1002–1004. Niehaus et al., 2001. 37.Niehaus DJ, Kinnear CJ, Corfield VA, du Toit PL, van Kradenburg J, Moolman-Smook JC, et al. Association between a catechol-O-methyltransferase polymorphism and obsessive–compulsive disorder in the Afrikaner population. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2001;1:61–65. Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (115 KB)
Ongur and Goff, 2005. 38.Ongur D, Goff DC. Obsessive–compulsive symptoms in schizophrenia: associated clinical features, cognitive function and medication status. Schizophrenia Research. 2005;2–3:349–362. Palmatier et al., 1999. 39.Palmatier MA, Kang AM, Kidd KK. Global variation in the frequencies of functionally different catechol-O-methyltransferase alleles. Biological Psychiatry. 1999;4:557–567. Poyurovsky et al., 1999. 40.Poyurovsky M, Fuchs C, Weizman A. Obsessive–compulsive disorder in patients with first-episode schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1999;12:1998–2000. Pujol et al., 2004. 41.Pujol J, Soriano-Mas C, Alonso P, Cardoner N, Menchon JM, Deus J, et al. Mapping structural brain alterations in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2004;7:720–730. Rothe et al., 2006. 42.Rothe C, Koszycki D, Bradwejn J, King N, Deluca V, Tharmalingam S, et al. Association of the Val158Met catechol-O-methyltransferase genetic polymorphism with panic disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006;10:2237–2242. Sauer and Gut, 2002. 43.Sauer S, Gut IG. Genotyping single-nucleotide polymorphisms by matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technological Biomedical Life Sciences. 2002;1–2:73–87. Schindler et al., 2000. 44.Schindler KM, Richter MA, Kennedy JL, Pato MT, Pato CN. Association between homozygosity at the COMT gene locus and obsessive compulsive disorder. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 2000;6:721–724. Tunbridge et al., 2006. 45.Tunbridge EM, Harrison PJ, Weinberger DR. Catechol-O-methyltransferase, cognition, and psychosis: Val158Met and beyond. Biological Psychiatry. 2006;2:141–151. MEDLINE van den Heuvel et al., 2005. 46.van den Heuvel OA, Veltman DJ, Groenewegen HJ, Cath DC, van Balkom AJ, van Hartskamp J, et al. Frontal-striatal dysfunction during planning in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2005;3:301–309. van der Wee et al., 2004. 47.van der Wee NJ, Stevens H, Hardeman JA, Mandl RC, Denys DA, van Megen HJ, et al. Enhanced dopamine transporter density in psychotropic-naive patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder shown by [123I]{beta}-CIT SPECT. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2004;12:2201–2206. Wahlstrom et al., 2007. 48.Wahlstrom D, White T, Hooper CJ, Vrshek-Schallhorn S, Oetting WS, Brott MJ, et al. Variations in the catechol-O-methyltransferase polymorphism and prefrontally guided behaviors in adolescents. Biological Psychiatry. 2007;61:626–632. Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (158 KB)
Weinberger et al., 2001. 49.Weinberger DR, Egan MF, Bertolino A, Callicott JH, Mattay VS, Lipska BK, et al. Prefrontal neurons and the genetics of schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry. 2001;11:825–844. a Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands b Neurogenetics Laboratory, Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Corresponding author. Academic Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, Tafelbergweg 25 (P1–146), 1105 BC Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Tel.: +31 20 5662240; fax: +31 20 5667072.
☆ This study was presented in part at the Meeting of the Society of Biological Psychiatry, May 18–21, 2005, Atlanta, GA, USA, and at the Biennial Winter Workshop on Schizophrenia Research, 4th–10th February 2006, Davos, Switzerland. PII: S0165-1781(07)00030-3 doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2007.02.001 © 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. | 1 of 48  |
| |
|