Psychiatry Research
Volume 176, Issue 1 , Pages 45-50, 30 March 2010

The validity of the Dutch K10 and extended K10 screening scales for depressive and anxiety disorders

  • Tara Donker

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Psychology, EMGO Institute, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. VU University, Department of Clinical Psychology, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 20 5988 265; fax: +31 20 5988 758.
  • ,
  • Hannie Comijs

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, EMGO-Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Pim Cuijpers

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Psychology, EMGO Institute, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Berend Terluin

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Practice, EMGO-Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Willem Nolen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Frans Zitman

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Brenda Penninx

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, EMGO-Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
    • Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Received 5 June 2008; received in revised form 19 November 2008; accepted 5 January 2009.

Abstract 

The aim of this study was to validate the Dutch version of the Kessler-10 (K10) as well as an extended version (EK10) in screening for depressive and anxiety disorders in primary care. Data are from 1607 participants (18 through 65 years, 68.8% female) of the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA), recruited from 65 general practitioners. Participants completed the K10, extended with five additional questions focusing on core anxiety symptoms, and were evaluated with the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI lifetime version 2.1) to assess DSM-IV disorders (major depressive disorder, dysthymia, generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, panic disorder, agoraphobia). Reliability (Cronbach's α) of the Dutch K10 was 0.94. Based on Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) for the K10 for any depressive and/or anxiety disorder was found to be 0.87. The extended questions on the EK10 significantly improved the detection of anxiety disorders in particular. With a cut-off point of 20, the K10 reached a sensitivity of 0.80 and a specificity of 0.81 for any depressive and/or anxiety disorder. For the EK10, a cut-off point of 20 and/or at least one positive answer on the additional questions provided a sensitivity of 0.90 and a specificity of 0.75 for detecting any depressive and/or anxiety disorder. The Dutch version of the K10 is appropriate for screening depressive disorders in primary care, while the EK10 is preferred in screening for both depressive and anxiety disorders.

Keywords: Screening questionnaire, Depression, Anxiety, Sensitivity, Specificity

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0165-1781(09)00020-1

doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2009.01.012

Psychiatry Research
Volume 176, Issue 1 , Pages 45-50, 30 March 2010