Elsevier

Psychiatry Research

Volume 225, Issues 1–2, 30 January 2015, Pages 85-92
Psychiatry Research

Construct validity of a short, self report instrument assessing emotional dysregulation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2014.10.020Get rights and content

Highlights

  • This brief measure of emotion dysregulation provides an important predictive utility in relation to psychopathology and resiliency factors.

  • This measure is a useful instrument for measuring emotion dysregulation in traumatized, primarily African American, urban-dwelling and low-income populations.

  • Although the majority of the sample in this study was female (>60%), the data show similar patterns for both men and women suggesting that the instrument is valid for both groups. More research in this area is indicated.

  • This brief instrument may enable greater usability for investigators to measure emotion dysregulation in large scale studies or for use as a clinical screener.

Abstract

There is a need for a brief measure of emotion dysregulation that can be used in large-scale studies. This study evaluated the construct validity of a short, self-report instrument of emotion dysregulation. Subjects (N=2197) were recruited from primary care clinics of an urban public hospital as part of a study of trauma-related risk and resilience. Emotion dysregulation was measured using the Emotion Dysregulation Scale, short version (EDS-short), a12-item self-report measure assessing emotional experiencing, cognition, and behavior. EDS-short was first compared with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). Then, the construct validity of the EDS-short in predicting depression, posttraumatic stress, substance abuse, borderline pathology, suicide attempts, psychiatric hospitalizations, positive affect, and resiliency was assessed. We found a significant positive correlation between EDS-short and DERS. The EDS-short was significantly predictive of higher reported depressive, posttraumatic stress, substance abuse, and borderline symptoms, and lower reported positive affect and resiliency, over and above demographic characteristics and negative affect. Our results demonstrate that the EDS-short is a useful instrument for measuring emotion dysregulation in traumatized populations. A brief measure of emotion dysregulation is critical as the field moves forward in studying the wide ranging negative effects of emotion dysregulation across psychiatric disorders and outcomes.

Introduction

Emotion dysregulation reflects deficits in awareness and acceptance of emotions as well as in regulation strategies to manage intense negative emotional states (Gross and Thompson, 2007). In some disorders, such as borderline personality disorder (BPD), emotion dysregulation is a hallmark symptom that may lead to the development of other symptoms as well as functional problems (Bornovalova et al., 2008; Linehan, 1993; Tragesser et al., 2007). However, with increasing research now points to the importance of emotion dysregulation in understanding both current psychological functioning and risk for psychopathology, even in psychiatric disorders where emotion dysregulation is not a diagnostic criterion (Charney, 2004, Green et al., 2007, Lei et al., 2014, McLaughlin et al., 2009, Svaldi et al., 2012). For example, although emotion dysregulation is not explicitly a symptom of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a number of the symptoms of PTSD also represent failures to effectively regulate the experience and expression of emotions (e.g., anger/irritability) and others reflect efforts to regulate emotions that impair adaptive functioning (e.g., avoidance behaviors). It can also be seen as a risk factor that may lead to PTSD. Emotion dysregulation is now understood as a transdiagnostic process that impacts many psychological disorders, spanning mood, anxiety, substance use, and personality disorders (Berenbaum et al., 2003, Bradley et al., 2011b, Brockmeyer et al., 2012, Hopper et al., 2007, Kring, 2008).

Difficulties with emotion regulation are often found in individuals exposed to traumatic events, particularly in early life (Kim and Cicchetti, 2010, Maughan and Cicchetti, 2002, Shields and Cicchetti, 1998). Developmental research suggests that a combination of inherent temperamental or biological factors and adverse childhood experiences (e.g., childhood abuse) may increase risk for adult emotion regulation deficits. The deficits are a risk factor for adult psychopathology, including substance abuse, depression, and PTSD (Burns et al., 2010, Romens and Pollak, 2012). Therefore, emotion dysregulation appears to be an important potential mechanism by which early life adversity confers lifetime risk for psychological disorders.

In the past, emotion dysregulation and negative affect were often conceptualized as two components of a common construct, with emotion dysregulation thought to fall into the broader category of negative affect. There is already a well-established body of literature demonstrating the importance of negative affect in many psychological disorders, with research showing that negative affect is a higher order construct fundamental to various psychiatric conditions, including personality pathology, depression, PTSD, and more (Krueger, 1999, Watson and Clark, 1992). While emotion dysregulation is clearly related to negative affect, recent evidence suggests it is a distinct construct (Gyurak et al., 2011, John and Gross, 2004). Broadly speaking, negative affect reflects types of emotions people have (e.g., anger, sadness), while emotion regulation reflects the ability to adaptively manage emotions (including negative ones) as they arise. The distinct importance of emotion dysregulation in psychological health is supported by the increasing number of interventions that now incorporate components focused on decreasing emotional dysregulation in individuals with varying types of psychopathology (Fehlinger et al., 2013, McMain et al., 2001, Mennin, 2006). This is done through a variety of techniques including psychoeduation regarding emotional experience, building emotional understanding and acceptance, and teaching patients strategies for how to manage intense, negative emotions as they arise.

While emotional dysregulation is likely to be most accurately and thoroughly assessed through a multi-method approach using structured clinical interview, behavioral tasks, and/or functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) strategies, many large-scale studies that focus on risk and resilience to psychiatric disease do not have the capacity to do such lengthy or time-consuming assessments. Several self-report instruments of emotion dysregulation have been created to assess this construct and have been validated and shown to relate to psychopathology and general functioning in various populations (Bradley et al., 2011a, Bradley et al., 2011b, Catanzaro and Mearns, 1990, Ehring and Quack, 2010, Gratz and Roemer, 2004, Smith et al., 2014, Tull et al., 2007). However, longer self-report measures such as the 36-item Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS, Gratz and Roemer, 2004), one of the most widely used measures of emotion dysregulation, may still take more time to complete than is feasible to large scale genetic or epidemiological studies. The development of a very brief scale indexing individual differences in emotion dysregulation could allow for greater usability in such studies and for enhanced knowledge about the presence and impact of emotion dysregulation across varied populations. A short self-report emotion dysregulation measure could also be beneficial in clinical practice to provide clinicians with a quick evaluation of whether emotion regulation difficulties are present for a given client.

We developed a 12-item self-report instrument of emotion dysregulation, the Emotion Dysregulation Scale, short version (EDS-short) which is based on previous research using the clinician-rated Affect Regulation and Experience Q-sort Questionnaire (Westen et al., 1997, Zittel and Westen, 2005). The EDS-short is a time-efficient questionnaire that captures multiple aspects of emotion dysregulation including emotional experiencing, cognition, and behavior. This manuscript is an initial effort to validate this short measure in a highly traumatized, urban population and demonstrate the construct validity of the instrument through 1) comparison with another already validated measure of emotion dysregulation and 2) the evaluation of the association between EDS-short and various important outcome measures. More specifically, the associations between EDS-short scale and depressive symptoms, PTSD symptoms, substance abuse symptoms, BPD symptoms, number of suicide attempts and psychiatric hospitalizations, positive affect, and resilient coping was assessed. For this study, we focused on outcome variables that have been previously linked with emotion dysregulation, including those that represent common psychiatric problems in this population (i.e., suicidality, depression, PTSD, substance use disorders, and personality disorders), as well as problematic outcomes (i.e., psychiatric hospitalizations) and potential resiliency factors (i.e., positive affect, coping; El-Bassel et al., 2003, Gillespie et al., 2009, Gratz et al., 2008, Meadows et al., 2005). Because emotion dysregulation has been associated with varying types of psychopathology, we did not expect to find divergence across psychiatric symptoms and instead predicted that emotion dysregulation would show positive association with mood, substance, anxiety, and personality disorder symptoms, while showing negative associations with resiliency factors.

Section snippets

Procedure

Participants were drawn from an NIMH-funded study of risk factors for the development of PTSD in a low socioeconomic, primarily African American urban population. Participants were recruited from waiting rooms in the gynecology and primary care medical (non-psychiatric) clinics at Grady Memorial Hospital, a publicly funded hospital in Atlanta, Georgia. Interviewers approached participants waiting for appointments. To be eligible for participation, subjects had to be at least 18 years old and

Cross-validation with DERS

In order to examine the construct validity of the EDS-short in measuring emotion dysregulation, we first examined the relationship between the EDS-short scale and another well-validated measure of emotion dysregulation, the DERS (Sample 1). There was a large, significant positive association between EDS-short and DERS total. Correlations of the EDS-short with the subscales of the DERS varied, but remained significant at p<0.01 (see Table 2). The associations with impulse control and lack of

Discussion

Our findings indicate that this brief, self-report measure of emotion dysregulation shows good construct validity, relating to other measures of emotion dysregulation as well as a range of criterion variables relating to both risk and resiliency for psychopathology. More specifically, the EDS-short was highly correlated with the DERS, an already well-validated longer self-report measure of emotion dysregulation (e.g., Ehring and Quack, 2010, Gratz and Roemer, 2004, Tull et al., 2007). The

References (60)

  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders(4th ed., text rev.)

    (2000)
  • L. Alink et al.

    Mediating and moderating processes in the relation between maltreatment and psychopathology: mother–child relationship quality and emotion regulation

    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

    (2009)
  • A.T. Beck et al.

    Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories IA and-II in psychiatric outpatients

    Journal of Personality Assessment

    (1996)
  • A.T. Beck et al.

    Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II

    (1996)
  • H. Berenbaum et al.

    A taxonomy of emotional disturbances

    Clinical Psychology: Scence and Practice

    (2003)
  • N. Blum et al.

    Relationship of age to symptom severity, psychiatric comorbidity and health care utilization in persons with borderline personality disorder

    Personality and Mental Health

    (2008)
  • M. Bornovalova et al.

    A multimodal assessment of the relationship between emotion dysregulation and borderline personality disorder among inner-city substance users in residential treatment

    Journal of Psychiatric Research

    (2008)
  • B. Bradley et al.

    Emotion dysregulation and negative affect: association with psychiatric symptoms

    The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

    (2011)
  • B. Bradley et al.

    Association between childhood maltreatment and adult emotional dysregulation in a low income, urban, African American sample: moderation by oxytocin receptor gene

    Development and Psychopathology

    (2011)
  • E. Burns et al.

    Childhood maltreatment, emotion regulation, and posttraumatic stress: the impact of emotional abuse

    Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, & Trauma

    (2010)
  • S.D. Calkins et al.

    Caregiver Influences on emerging emotion regulation: biological and environmental transactions in early development

  • L. Campbell-Sills et al.

    Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): validation of a 10-item measure of resilience

    Journal of Traumatic Stress

    (2007)
  • S. Catanzaro et al.

    Measuring generalized expectancies for negative mood regulation: Initial scale development and implications

    Journal of Personality Assessment

    (1990)
  • D. Charney

    Psychobiological mechanisms of resilience and vulnerability: implications for successful adaptation to extreme stress

    American Journal of Psychiatry

    (2004)
  • D. Cicchetti et al.

    Emotions and emotion regulation in developmental psychopathology

    Development and Psychopathology

    (1995)
  • L. Clark

    SNAP (Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality): Manual for Administration, Scoring and Interpretation

    (1993)
  • K.M. Cocco et al.

    Psychometric properties of the Drug Abuse Screening Test in psychiatric outpatients

    Psychological Assessment

    (1998)
  • S. Coffey et al.

    Screening for PTSD in a substance abuse sample: psychometric properties of a modified version of the PTSD symptom scale self report

    Journal of Traumatic Stress

    (1998)
  • C. Conklin et al.

    Affect regulation in borderline personality disorder

    Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders

    (2006)
  • D. Dozois et al.

    A psychometric evalution of the Beck Depression Inventory – II

    Psychological Assessment

    (1998)
  • Cited by (0)

    This work was primarily supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (MH071537, MH100122, MH102890) and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD071982). Support also included Emory and Grady Memorial Hospital General Clinical Research Center, NIH National Centers for Research Resources (M01 RR00039), and the Burroughs Welcome Fund.

    View full text